Hello all--first time poster, getting very interested in and excited for Counterparty! Have a finance background, and I'm trying to get a better handle on what you can do in terms of derivatives on this platform, both as of today and in the future, and how this compares to the 'old world' approach to derivatives. Here are some specific questions I have:
1) My sense is that you can have leveraged positions that are trustless. Is this correct?
2) What type of options exist today in Counterparty, other than binary options? Is it possible to do trustless puts and calls today? If not, is it expected that these are feasible and in development?
3) In general, one thing I'm really curious to understand is whether or not its possible to have trustless derivatives (or bets) without requiring the upfront escrow. Am I right in thinking that, at least as of today, that escrow is the critical component behind trustless transactions?
In terms of this becoming the new model for derivatives, the problem I see is that institutions will perceive having to tie funds up in escrow for the duration of the contract as a serious downside. Today, companies can enter into a futures contract on an exchange (with a clearinghouse that virtually eliminates all counterparty risk) and only have to post an initial margin amount that is a relatively small % of the notional value of the position. By and large, they really only have to put up the cash/collateral to the extent the position goes out of the money.
The benefit of this is that instead of tying up funds in an escrow, they can deploy that cash elsewhere and earn a return on it. Typically, they would then have revolving credit lines available as a liquidity backstop, to be drawn on as needed if their hedges/bets go against them. Those facilities are often quite inexpensive, especially when you're not actually drawing on them. This is particularly true of investment grade companies.
TL;DR: Companies will not like tying up so much capital in escrow, when the traditional financial realm allows them to instead deploy that capital and earn a return on it. How would you respond to this perceived limitation?
4) With the contracts for differences that exist today in Counterparty space, what happens if a position goes so far out of the money that it exceeds the amount that was initially put into escrow? Is the position then closed out immediately? If you’re on the side that’s in the money, do you have any means to capture that additional value beyond the amount that your counterparty put into escrow, or is that the max that you can receive?
If the escrow effectively sets the cap on what you can receive, that would seem to be an unfortunate limitation. E.g., say you're using these positions to hedge. Is it the case that the size of the escrow effectively determines the extent to which you are truly hedged, i.e. how big of a price move you are hedged against?
Thanks in advance—eager to learn more!!