# CounterParty server database is behind backend

**URL:** <https://forums.counterparty.io/t/counterparty-server-database-is-behind-backend/1856>\
**Category:** Server\
**Created:** [March 2, 2016, 1:29am UTC](https://forums.counterparty.io/t/counterparty-server-database-is-behind-backend/1856 "2016-03-02T01:29:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![something](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex004/user_avatar/forums.counterparty.io/something/32/240_2.png) [@something](https://forums.counterparty.io/u/something)\
**Post date:** [March 2, 2016, 9:03pm UTC](https://forums.counterparty.io/t/counterparty-server-database-is-behind-backend/1856/5 "2016-03-02T21:03:04Z")

</div>

You’re welcome.

Today the TX situation is even worse - a new record it seems, over 257,000 transactions: [Blockchain.com | Charts - Confirmed Transactions Per Day](https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions)

If this is a test server where you can experiment, check out 0.12, it seems more responsive to me. You can install the both (i.e. get the binaries and put them in a different path) and run either 0.11.2 or 0.12rc\* on the same blockchain (not at the same time, of course).

> [@Bitcoin Server 0.12 addrindex available for testing](https://forums.counterparty.io/t/bitcoin-server-0-12-addrindex-available-for-testing/1842/1):
>
> Those who run full node can check out BTCDrak’s own RC of Bitcoin Core 0.12 with addrindex (which is required for Counterparty Server). I tested Win32 and it seems to run much faster than v0.11.2. Having said that, there are also some 0.12 bugs (see Bitcoin Core issues on Github). But because there’s nothing to install (if you use BTCDrak’s prebuild binaries), it’s easy to test without uninstalling existing Bitcoin Core (0.11, for example) - you can simply run 0.12 from any directory and poi…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.counterparty.io/t/counterparty-server-database-is-behind-backend/1856)._
